Search
+
    SEARCHED FOR:

    PASSENGER RIGHTS

    Before you accept that flight credit after the ground stop, read this: Rebooking could cost you your refund

    Passengers faced significant disruptions due to the FAA's ground stop on November 13th as cancellations increased. Airlines implemented travel waivers allowing customers to modify travel plans without fees, but refunds are often overlooked. Individuals may qualify for full refunds if flights are canceled or substantially changed by airlines, regardless of the situation. It is essential for passengers to know their rights before accepting flight credits or cancelling bookings.

    Your flight was cancelled by the FAA ground stop: You’re owed a refund, but your airline doesn’t have to pay for your hotel

    FAA flight cancellations: Why passengers are entitled to a full refund? Passengers affected by an FAA ground stop can claim a full refund if they reject rebooking and choose not to travel. Even nonrefundable tickets qualify. But airlines generally don't have to cover hotel stays, meals or local transport when the disruption comes from FAA restrictions rather than their own operations.

    Stuck on the tarmac during a ground stop? The rules on how long airlines can keep you on board

    The FAA's November 13 nationwide ground stop disrupted flights after communications failures affected air traffic control centers. Passengers still have refund rights when flights are canceled. For domestic tarmac delays, airlines generally must let passengers off within three hours, subject to safety and security exceptions.

    What happened to US airlines today? Over 15,000 flights cancelled after longest nationwide ground stop in 25 years

    On November 14, a telecommunications failure caused the cancellation of over 2,000 flights across the United States, leading to the most extensive nationwide ground stop in a quarter-century. This event affected more than 15,000 flights, leaving many passengers stranded with long delays. Those impacted are eligible for refunds according to regulations from the US Department of Transportation.

    At the Supreme Court, Trump aims to cut the power of judges again

    Trump's administration is appealing to the Supreme Court to limit judges' ability to block federal agency actions. This appeal is focused on the Administrative Procedure Act and its restrictive judicial interpretations. A Fifth Circuit ruling had previously voided parts of a regulation due to APA violations. The administration argues that courts should limit relief to specific plaintiffs rather than issuing nationwide injunctions.

    ET Prime Special Series: Multibagger or IBC – Part 84: Can rising demand for decorative features drive this auto ancillary's growth?

    A car can change its engine and still look almost the same. It can also keep the same engine and look so different that buyers happily pay more for it. That is the peculiar corner of the automobile industry this story explores. For one listed supplier, the shift to EVs may be less threatening than it sounds. The bigger question is whether changing consumer preferences can help it build a more valuable business.

    The Economic Times
    BACK TO TOP