COURT CHALLENGE
A Minnesota county sold a woman's condo for $40,000 over a $15,000 tax debt and kept the rest; what did the US Supreme Court say?
Notably, the original tax bill was around $2,300. But, after interest and penalties, the debt was increased to around $15,000. Hennepin County sold the property for $40,000 and kept the money left after settling Tyler's tax debt, according to the US Supreme Court. The dispute was mostly about whether the county could keep more than Tyler owed.
Anna Nicole Smith won $474 million in her fight over her billionaire husband's fortune, but the Supreme Court took it all away; what happened?
After his death, Smith began a legal battle over his estate in Texas. She challenged the inheritance arrangements and argued that she was entitled to a share of her husband's wealth. The Texas probate proceedings did not go in her favour. The dispute then moved into federal bankruptcy proceedings in California. Smith's stepson, E. Pierce Marshall, had filed a defamation claim against her in those proceedings.
Trump's grand arch project hits legal roadblock
A major point of contention is the proposed location of the 250-foot (76-metre) structure, next to Arlington National Cemetery, the final resting place of hundreds of thousands of American service members. The giant arch would be considerably taller than the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, which inspired the design.
BCI withdraws age limit for 3-year, 5-year law courses; Supreme Court disposes of plea against age restriction
Taking note of the BCI's decision, a bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana disposed of the plea filed against the age restriction. In March 2017, the top court had stayed the decision of the Bar Council of India (BCI) prescribing an upper age limit of 22 years for the five-year LLB course and 45 years for the three-year course.
Supreme Court agrees to hear DMK leader's plea challenging rejection of election petition
The Supreme Court agreed to hear a plea by DMK leader K R Periyakaruppan regarding the election results. Periyakaruppan is contesting TVK candidate R Seenivasa Sethupathi's victory by one vote in Tamil Nadu Assembly elections. The Madras High Court had previously rejected Periyakaruppan's election petition challenging the results declared on May 4. The plea argues that a significant number of postal ballots were rejected, affecting the results.
Supreme Court refuses to suspend Tarun Tejpal's 10-year jail term
The Supreme Court refused to suspend Tarun Tejpal's 10-year prison sentence relating to a rape conviction. A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and Prasanna B Varale heard his plea for suspension. Tejpal was previously convicted by the Bombay High Court after a trial court had acquitted him five years ago. The case stems from a 2013 incident involving a junior colleague inside a hotel elevator.
- Go To Page 1
Michael Jackson’s daughter Paris accuses estate executor of charging $9.4 million fee as she seeks $600 million be moved into family trust
Paris Jackson has filed a request for $600 million to be transferred into a family trust. She has allege that executor John Branca has mismanaged the funds of Michael Jackson's estate significantly. Paris reportedly claims that her payments, along with those of her siblings, were reduced after she questioned the estate's management. The estate's representatives state that Paris has already received about $65 million from the estate.
Passenger wins Rs 3,100 after taking IRCTC to court over just Re 1; Kerala man challenges train ticket refund shortfall; consumer court delivers verdict
A Kerala passenger won Rs 3,100 in compensation after taking IRCTC to the consumer commission over a Re 1 shortfall in a cancelled train ticket refund. The Kasaragod commission termed the shortfall a deficiency in service. Meanwhile, Indian Railways revised its confirmed ticket cancellation and refund rules in March 2026.
Centre mulls panel to revisit UGC equity regulations amid Supreme Court case
On January 29, the Supreme Court stayed the operation of the 2026 UGC regulations due to concerns over ambiguity. The Centre has informed the court about the possibility of forming a committee to revisit these regulations. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stated that the government aims to address the concerns of all student groups. Several petitions have challenged the constitutional validity of specific provisions within the regulations.
24-hour period to produce before magistrate starts with detention, not formal arrest: SC
The Supreme Court ruled that the 24-hour period for presenting an accused to a magistrate starts with actual detention. This ruling clarifies that delays in formal arrests cannot violate constitutional protections. A recent case involved four individuals arrested under the NDPS Act with an unreasonable delay before appearance in court. The court emphasized the importance of safeguarding fundamental rights during detention and investigations.
Michigan man wanted neighbour's trees cut down, agreed to pay $2,000 towards removal, then sued him twice; court rules he cannot reopen the same dispute
Michigan neighbour dispute: A Michigan homeowner has lost his legal battle against a neighbour over trees that allegedly threatened his barn. After agreeing to split the $4,000 removal cost, the two neighbours ended up in court when the work was not carried out. The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that the homeowner could not file another lawsuit over the same dispute after an earlier court had already decided the matter.
Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid move SC seeking bail in UAPA case over 2020 Delhi riots
Activists Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid have challenged the Delhi High Court's refusal to grant them bail. They argue that the prosecution has not examined key protected witnesses in their case. Both activists were arrested in 2020 regarding the alleged conspiracy behind the February riots in northeast Delhi. The Supreme Court previously set conditions under which they could seek bail related to the charges.
UGC to relook controversial caste discrimination, ragging rules: Govt tells SC
The Centre has told the Supreme Court that it is considering appointing a committee to revisit the UGC's 2026 regulations on caste discrimination in higher education institutions. The submission comes after the top court put the rules on hold in January, citing concerns over vague provisions and their potential consequences.
Sharjeel Imam moves SC seeking bail in UAPA case over 2020 Delhi riots
Sharjeel Imam has moved the Supreme Court for bail regarding his involvement in the February 2020 riots. The Delhi High Court previously denied bail, citing the need for witness examinations. Imam argues that the prosecution has yet to examine any witnesses in over six months. Despite these circumstances, he continues to face serious charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
Man files case to end railway's 6 am-10 pm sleeping rule after unwell wife denied extra sleep; HC makes important observation for middle and upper berth passengers
The Madras High Court has refused to strike down the Indian Railways' rule allowing passengers to use sleeping berths in reserved coaches only between 10 pm and 6 am. Upholding the restriction, the court said it balances passengers' convenience by ensuring seating space during the day, while noting exemptions for sick passengers, persons with disabilities and pregnant women.
SC declines plea for rotation of reserved constituencies, says Parliament must decide
The Supreme Court has declined to direct the rotation of constituencies reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in state assemblies and Parliament, saying the introduction of such a mechanism is for Parliament to decide. It dismissed a plea challenging constituencies remaining reserved for SC candidates for nearly seven decades.
SC seeks Centre, ECI response to plea challenging blanket immunity for Election Commissioners
The Supreme Court has sought responses from the Centre and the Election Commission on a plea challenging legal immunity granted to the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners for acts performed in official duties. The petition questions whether Section 16 of the 2023 law violates constitutional principles of equality, accountability and access to justice.
SC questions relevance of two-child norm for contesting elections, cites changing demographic trends
The Supreme Court has questioned the continued relevance of laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting elections, citing India's declining fertility rate and changing demographics. Referring a challenge to Maharashtra's two-child eligibility rule to a larger bench, it also raised concerns over reproductive autonomy and democratic participation.
Supreme Court issues notice on plea challenging blanket immunity granted to CEC Gyanesh Kumar, ECs amid SIR row
The Supreme Court has asked the Centre and Election Commission of India to respond to a petition. This petition challenges the blanket legal immunity provided to the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners for their official actions. The petitioner argues that this immunity lacks accountability and covers acts without good faith. Additionally, the Act has faced scrutiny regarding its amendment process and previous rulings.
India says PepsiCo, Monster marketed with 'energy drink' label to dupe consumers
India's food regulator FSSAI has accused PepsiCo and Monster Beverage of misleading consumers by marketing high-caffeine products as energy drinks, defending its ban on the label. The dispute has escalated into a legal battle, with the regulator citing public health risks linked to caffeine, sugar and taurine content.
SC says 1974 ruling on states' power to levy additional sales tax continues to hold
The Supreme Court held that a previous ruling from 1974 regarding additional sales tax remains applicable today. It determined that the legal question raised was now of no practical significance due to legislative changes. The Goods and Services Tax law implementation in 2017 contributed to this determination. The court ruled that state legislatures' ability to impose surcharges is governed by existing precedents.
LaMonica McIver wins reelection: What to know about the New Jersey Democrat facing federal charges
LaMonica McIver has secured reelection for her second full term representing New Jersey's 10th District, garnering about 86% of the votes in the November 2026 election against Republican challenger Carmen Bucco. Despite facing federal charges related to an immigration detention center incident, McIver claims these allegations are driven by political motives.
SC to decide forum for Google billing disputes
Questioning the app developers on whether their contracts with Google allowed them to opt out of its payment system and engage other payment service providers, a bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe said that the commission, being a market regulator, ensured that goods and services were distributed effectively without exploitation. But for contracts where there was a promise and agreement in existence, its enforcement could be sought in a civil court only, it said.
Reddit blasts Australia's 'inept' social media ban as court challenge begins
Australia's world-first teen social media ban was "ill thought out" and amounted to a "profound restriction on political debate", a lawyer for messaging platform Reddit told the country's top court in the first legal challenge to the law.
US Supreme Court snubs Trump admin in California ballots case
The US Supreme Court rejected an emergency request by the Trump administration regarding mail-in ballots in California. This request aimed to challenge over 20,000 ballots on the assumption that voters might be non-citizens. Lower courts previously dismissed similar allegations, arguing they indicated election interference. The administration had also faced challenges regarding other states' elections, including Alaska. Voter fraud cases are consistently found to be rare and not affecting election results.
SP leader Azam Khan challenges ED arrest in Supreme Court, plea to be heard later this week
Mohammad Azam Khan has approached the Supreme Court to challenge his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate. He was detained by the ED shortly after his release from Rampur jail, where he had been imprisoned since November 2025. Khan's release came following an Allahabad High Court decision that granted him bail in a separate matter. The High Court suspended his sentence but did not stay his conviction.
Imran Khan tenders unconditional apology to Bombay HC, vows not to join protests amid ‘Leave India’ notice row
Imran Khan submitted an unconditional apology to the Bombay High Court as he challenges a 'Leave India Notice'. This notice was issued by the Foreigners Regional Registration Office after his alleged participation in a protest. The court has scheduled a hearing for December 7, which keeps the notice in abeyance for the time being.
SP leader Azam Khan moves Supreme Court challenging ED arrest in Jauhar Trust money laundering case
Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan has taken his case to the Supreme Court following his recent detention by the Enforcement Directorate. After his arrest related to the Jauhar Trust, a special court in Ghaziabad placed Khan in 14 days of judicial custody. His legal team has filed a plea for a hearing, though the court has denied an urgent review at this time.
Ajay Devgn's Vimal Elaichi ad controversy: FDA chief Tukaram Munde says proceedings will continue despite Drishyam 3 actor's High Court plea
Ajay Devgn has filed a petition with the Bombay High Court in response to a notice from the Maharashtra FDA regarding his appearance in Vimal Elaichi ads. The FDA contends that these ads promote a banned product. Commissioner Tukaram Munde affirmed that legal procedures will be followed. Read on!
Load More
