The Economic Times daily newspaper is available online now.

    India says PepsiCo, Monster marketed with 'energy drink' label to dupe consumers

    Synopsis

    India's food regulator FSSAI has accused PepsiCo and Monster Beverage of misleading consumers by marketing high-caffeine products as energy drinks, defending its ban on the label. The dispute has escalated into a legal battle, with the regulator citing public health risks linked to caffeine, sugar and taurine content.

    PepsiCo warns energy drinks could vanish in two months as court upholds label banReuters
    FSSAI has accused PepsiCo and Monster Beverage of misleading consumers through energy drink labelling as it defends its ban on the term, citing potential health risks and the absence of established regulatory standards for the category. (Representative image)
    New Delhi: India's food regulator has accused PepsiCo and Monster Beverage of marketing their high-caffeine beverages as energy drinks to "dupe" consumers, according to court filings reviewed by Reuters, marking an escalation in its defence of a labelling ban.

    The legal battle is part of an unprecedented food safety crackdown in India and is seen as a test of how far the regulator can go in policing labels. The energy drinks market is set to be worth $1.6 billion by 2028, with sales growing 12.6% annually, faster ​than in the ⁠US and China, Euromonitor says.

    PepsiCo, which popularized energy drinks in India with its 2017 launch of 21-cent bottles of Sting drink, and Monster Beverage have mounted separate legal challenges against a June decision barring use of the term "energy drink", arguing the regulator acted without warning or giving the companies a chance to be heard.


    The FSSAI, seeking dismissal of the challenges, said India had never established standards for an energy drink category.

    "Purposely in order to dupe the consumers, a product is being marketed as a 'Energy Drink'," FSSAI said in court filings dated October 28.

    The Delhi High Court last month did allow the companies to exhaust their old stock with "energy drink" labels, but not to use the label for any new stock.

    FLAGGING HEALTH CONCERNS

    PepsiCo and Monster did not respond to Reuters queries, and neither did the FSSAI. The case is due to be heard later this week.

    The tussle has also seen lawsuits from Red Bull, Hell Energy and India's Reliance Consumer, which is part of billionaire Mukesh Ambani's Reliance.

    The latest court filings show the regulator highlighting health implications of energy drinks, saying they contain high caffeine, sugar, and taurine, an amino acid which researchers say can contribute to health problems.

    "The regulatory concern is rooted in serious public health risks and consumer deception," FSSAI's filings said.

    Amid growing health concerns globally, England has announced a ban on such drinks for under-16s from April next year.

    Add ET Logo as a Reliable and Trusted News Source

    (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)

    (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)

    Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.

    ...more
    The Economic Times

    Stories you might be interested in