SUPREME COURT RULING
Karnataka Chief Minister Shivakumar seeks Tamil Nadu's support for Mekedatu, says SC has cleared Karnataka's case
Karnataka Chief Minister DK Shivakumar announced the state would advance with the Mekedatu balancing reservoir project. The Supreme Court has already confirmed Karnataka's right to develop the project while adhering to water-sharing agreements. Shivakumar invited Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Joseph Vijay to engage collaboratively in the matter. Karnataka has identified land for compensatory afforestation and is preparing the necessary application.
Delhi govt urges citizens to burst only green crackers, stick to specific timings: Check permitted time, restricted areas and other key details
Delhi pollution news: Delhi government has outlined restrictions on firecracker use for the upcoming Diwali festival. Green firecrackers will be allowed only on specific dates and times in November. The sale is limited to certified green firecrackers at authorized locations only. Violators of these regulations may face penalties and confiscation of illegal products. Supreme Court has mandated these conditions to reduce pollution and noise during the celebrations.
Compulsory retirement order is neither punitive nor stigmatic in character: SC
The Supreme Court upheld the Chhattisgarh government's order of compulsory retirement for several employees. It noted such orders are not punitive or indicative of misconduct against the employees. The court emphasised the importance of objective evaluations when determining an employee's suitability for continued service. It clarified that the decision should not be based on mere conjecture or whim.
Anna Nicole Smith won $474 million in her fight over her billionaire husband's fortune, but the Supreme Court took it all away; what happened?
After his death, Smith began a legal battle over his estate in Texas. She challenged the inheritance arrangements and argued that she was entitled to a share of her husband's wealth. The Texas probate proceedings did not go in her favour. The dispute then moved into federal bankruptcy proceedings in California. Smith's stepson, E. Pierce Marshall, had filed a defamation claim against her in those proceedings.
BCI withdraws age limit for 3-year, 5-year law courses; Supreme Court disposes of plea against age restriction
Taking note of the BCI's decision, a bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana disposed of the plea filed against the age restriction. In March 2017, the top court had stayed the decision of the Bar Council of India (BCI) prescribing an upper age limit of 22 years for the five-year LLB course and 45 years for the three-year course.
SC issues notice to all office bearers of Keralam unit of Cong over post targeting CJI Surya Kant
In a striking move, the Supreme Court has sent a contempt notice to Kerala's Congress party over a slanderous post aimed at the Chief Justice. The post quickly went viral, prompting fierce criticism leading to its removal by the party. KPCC president Sunny Joseph affirmed that the offending member was terminated and asserted that such behavior does not align with the party’s values.
24-hour period to produce before magistrate starts with detention, not formal arrest: SC
The Supreme Court ruled that the 24-hour period for presenting an accused to a magistrate starts with actual detention. This ruling clarifies that delays in formal arrests cannot violate constitutional protections. A recent case involved four individuals arrested under the NDPS Act with an unreasonable delay before appearance in court. The court emphasized the importance of safeguarding fundamental rights during detention and investigations.
UGC to relook controversial caste discrimination, ragging rules: Govt tells SC
The Centre has told the Supreme Court that it is considering appointing a committee to revisit the UGC's 2026 regulations on caste discrimination in higher education institutions. The submission comes after the top court put the rules on hold in January, citing concerns over vague provisions and their potential consequences.
SC: Detained beyond 24 hours without magistrate? Release must be immediate
The Supreme Court has ruled that individuals detained for over 24 hours must be released immediately. This ruling specifies that the 24-hour countdown begins at the time of detention. Authorities are required to ensure detention remains reasonable within this timeframe. Magistrates must independently verify compliance with this ruling and document relevant dates and times.
SC upholds states’ power to levy additional sales tax, surcharge under pre-GST regime
The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of states imposing additional taxes, surcharges and cesses calculated as a percentage of sales or purchase tax under the pre-GST regime. A seven-judge Constitution Bench said the nearly 27-year-old reference had become academic after GST subsumed sales tax, while affirming that the 1974 S Kodar ruling remains good law.
SC says 1974 ruling on states' power to levy additional sales tax continues to hold
The Supreme Court held that a previous ruling from 1974 regarding additional sales tax remains applicable today. It determined that the legal question raised was now of no practical significance due to legislative changes. The Goods and Services Tax law implementation in 2017 contributed to this determination. The court ruled that state legislatures' ability to impose surcharges is governed by existing precedents.
With US midterms underway, courts rebuff Trump's pressure on state election officials
Federal judges issued rulings that restricted the Trump administration's efforts aimed at influencing state election officials. These efforts were primarily focused on alleged noncitizen voting, which evidence shows is quite rare. Multiple legal challenges led to precedents affirming state sovereignty regarding election administration. Despite these setbacks, the Justice Department continues to pursue various actions related to noncitizen voting. Recent decisions highlight ongoing tensions between federal and state election authority.
Trump's Supreme Court winning streak in election cases screeches to a halt
The US Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump's bid to stop California from counting more than 20,000 mail-in ballots ahead of Tuesday's midterm elections. The swift ruling marks another setback for the administration in recent election-related cases, following decisions on mail-in voting restrictions and Republican-backed congressional redistricting efforts.
US Supreme Court snubs Trump admin in California ballots case
The US Supreme Court rejected an emergency request by the Trump administration regarding mail-in ballots in California. This request aimed to challenge over 20,000 ballots on the assumption that voters might be non-citizens. Lower courts previously dismissed similar allegations, arguing they indicated election interference. The administration had also faced challenges regarding other states' elections, including Alaska. Voter fraud cases are consistently found to be rare and not affecting election results.
700% jump in airfare: Supreme Court says 'don't travel by air'
The Supreme Court refused urgent listing of a plea alleging a 700% surge in airfares, with the bench telling passengers, "Don't travel by air." The case comes amid growing scrutiny of unpredictable airline ticket prices in India. The court is separately hearing a plea seeking an independent aviation regulator, transparent airfare rules and stronger passenger protection against exorbitant fare hikes.
Family members can reject sale of joint HUF land and treat it as void if Karta sells it solely for personal benefit; Key legal rules you must know
In a Supreme Court ruling from earlier this year, the sale of joint ancestral property was deemed invalid if it only benefited one family member. The court highlighted that the head of a family must demonstrate genuine necessity for such sales. Karta is a manager and not an absolute owner of joint property. Sales favoring one coparcener are particularly susceptible to legal challenges.
Govt employees facing disciplinary action? Know these 7 important rights before accepting charges
Employees in the government sector who find themselves undergoing disciplinary reviews must be informed about their rights before replying to any allegations. They deserve clear charges and at least 15 days to respond. Should they dispute the charges, an oral inquiry, enabling cross-examination of the witnesses, is obligatory. These employees can also present their defense witnesses and seek a personal hearing.
RSS terms UGC norms against discrimination 'unbalanced'
RSS has expressed concerns regarding the University Grants Commission's anti-discrimination regulations, stating that they are unbalanced. The government is being urged to revise the framework to maintain social harmony. As the Supreme Court intervened, the UGC regulations were temporarily stayed, allowing the previous framework to continue. The RSS emphasised the need for balanced decisions that would foster societal strength and cohesion.
Woman joins contractual role for short-term, employer doesn't pay three months salary for taking maternity leave, High Court orders temporary employees should receive that benefit too
Chhattisgarh High Court has held that a woman working as a guest lecturer cannot be denied maternity leave salary merely because she is not a regular employee. Justice Bibhu Datta Guru directed the State authorities to decide Pushpa Jaiswal's claim for unpaid maternity salary, preferably within three months.
Load More
