Search
+
    SEARCHED FOR:

    SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT

    Woman deposits Rs 1 lakh in post office, postmaster issues receipt but no certificate, then runs away with her money; court orders department to pay her Rs 1.15 lakh

    A woman above 60 deposited Rs 1 lakh at Karnataka's Kodikoppa Post Office for a Senior Citizens' Savings Scheme account and Rs 500 for a savings account on November 14, 2023. After receiving neither certificate nor passbook, she approached the consumer commission, which ordered a refund with 6% interest, compensation and litigation costs.

    Supreme Court directs Punjab, Haryana to supply Himachal Pradesh's energy arrears

    A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant said the settlement would be implemented on a cashless basis, with the capital-cost liability being adjusted against the energy arrears and the remaining energy being supplied in accordance with the specified schedule.

    SC issues contempt notice to Kerala Congress leaders over post seeking CJI Surya Kant's resignation

    The Supreme Court has issued a show-cause contempt notice to Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee office-bearers over an October 12 social media post demanding Chief Justice Surya Kant's resignation. The bench said freedom of expression cannot be used to interfere with the administration of justice and warned against attempts to undermine judicial authority.

    SC upholds states’ power to levy additional sales tax, surcharge under pre-GST regime

    The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of states imposing additional taxes, surcharges and cesses calculated as a percentage of sales or purchase tax under the pre-GST regime. A seven-judge Constitution Bench said the nearly 27-year-old reference had become academic after GST subsumed sales tax, while affirming that the 1974 S Kodar ruling remains good law.

    SC says 1974 ruling on states' power to levy additional sales tax continues to hold

    The Supreme Court held that a previous ruling from 1974 regarding additional sales tax remains applicable today. It determined that the legal question raised was now of no practical significance due to legislative changes. The Goods and Services Tax law implementation in 2017 contributed to this determination. The court ruled that state legislatures' ability to impose surcharges is governed by existing precedents.

    SC to decide forum for Google billing disputes

    Questioning the app developers on whether their contracts with Google allowed them to opt out of its payment system and engage other payment service providers, a bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe said that the commission, being a market regulator, ensured that goods and services were distributed effectively without exploitation. But for contracts where there was a promise and agreement in existence, its enforcement could be sought in a civil court only, it said.

    The Economic Times
    BACK TO TOP