SUPREME COURT DECISION
A Minnesota county sold a woman's condo for $40,000 over a $15,000 tax debt and kept the rest; what did the US Supreme Court say?
Notably, the original tax bill was around $2,300. But, after interest and penalties, the debt was increased to around $15,000. Hennepin County sold the property for $40,000 and kept the money left after settling Tyler's tax debt, according to the US Supreme Court. The dispute was mostly about whether the county could keep more than Tyler owed.
SC orders MP assembly speaker Tomar to hear disqualification case against MLA Nirmala Sapre
The Supreme Court has directed the Madhya Pradesh assembly speaker to resolve a disqualification petition against MLA Nirmala Sapre. Sapre won her seat on a Congress ticket but announced her intention to join BJP during the campaign. This announcement raised questions about her allegiance, prompting a legal challenge from Congress leader Umang Singhar. The speaker's decision is required within two months to uphold the principles of the anti-defection law.
Compulsory retirement order is neither punitive nor stigmatic in character: SC
The Supreme Court upheld the Chhattisgarh government's order of compulsory retirement for several employees. It noted such orders are not punitive or indicative of misconduct against the employees. The court emphasised the importance of objective evaluations when determining an employee's suitability for continued service. It clarified that the decision should not be based on mere conjecture or whim.
Rs 8.02 lakh leave encashment tax exemption denied: Retired employee wins case in ITAT Surat
Retiree Mr. Patel from Bharuch, Gujarat, sought a complete tax exemption on Rs 8.02 lakh of leave encashment. Initially, his company certified only Rs 3 lakh as exempt. The Income Tax Department later imposed tax on an additional Rs 5.02 lakh. To challenge this ruling, Patel approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Surat, which sided with him, citing the Department's failure to provide justifiable reasons.
BCI withdraws age limit for 3-year, 5-year law courses; Supreme Court disposes of plea against age restriction
Taking note of the BCI's decision, a bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana disposed of the plea filed against the age restriction. In March 2017, the top court had stayed the decision of the Bar Council of India (BCI) prescribing an upper age limit of 22 years for the five-year LLB course and 45 years for the three-year course.
ECI restores DEC-level oversight of IT wing after 2 ECs raise concerns
The Election Commission of India issued a new work allocation order restoring oversight of the IT division. This change followed objections from two Election Commissioners regarding a prior order issued by senior Deputy Election Commissioner Maneesh Garg. Both Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi wrote to cabinet secretary TV Somanathan concerning Garg's unapproved directive.
- Go To Page 1
Supreme Court asks Calcutta High Court to fast-track plea against 10 rebel TMC MLAs
The Supreme Court asked the Calcutta High Court to urgently consider a plea seeking disqualification of 10 Trinamool Congress MLAs under the anti-defection law. Declining to entertain a direct disqualification petition, the apex court allowed senior TMC leader Sovandeb Chattopadhyay to approach the high court and requested expedited consideration by a division bench.
Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid move SC seeking bail in UAPA case over 2020 Delhi riots
Activists Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid have challenged the Delhi High Court's refusal to grant them bail. They argue that the prosecution has not examined key protected witnesses in their case. Both activists were arrested in 2020 regarding the alleged conspiracy behind the February riots in northeast Delhi. The Supreme Court previously set conditions under which they could seek bail related to the charges.
UGC to relook controversial caste discrimination, ragging rules: Govt tells SC
The Centre has told the Supreme Court that it is considering appointing a committee to revisit the UGC's 2026 regulations on caste discrimination in higher education institutions. The submission comes after the top court put the rules on hold in January, citing concerns over vague provisions and their potential consequences.
Sharjeel Imam moves SC seeking bail in UAPA case over 2020 Delhi riots
Sharjeel Imam has moved the Supreme Court for bail regarding his involvement in the February 2020 riots. The Delhi High Court previously denied bail, citing the need for witness examinations. Imam argues that the prosecution has yet to examine any witnesses in over six months. Despite these circumstances, he continues to face serious charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
SC upholds states’ power to levy additional sales tax, surcharge under pre-GST regime
The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of states imposing additional taxes, surcharges and cesses calculated as a percentage of sales or purchase tax under the pre-GST regime. A seven-judge Constitution Bench said the nearly 27-year-old reference had become academic after GST subsumed sales tax, while affirming that the 1974 S Kodar ruling remains good law.
Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann announces 3% DA hike for 8 lakh government employees this Diwali
Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann has announced a 3% increase in dearness allowance for state employees and pensioners. This decision will benefit approximately eight lakh government workers and follows recent protests for DA arrears. The previous DA rate was raised from 28% to 53% under the current government. Mann emphasised that his administration is open to employee discussions regarding their demands.
SC says 1974 ruling on states' power to levy additional sales tax continues to hold
The Supreme Court held that a previous ruling from 1974 regarding additional sales tax remains applicable today. It determined that the legal question raised was now of no practical significance due to legislative changes. The Goods and Services Tax law implementation in 2017 contributed to this determination. The court ruled that state legislatures' ability to impose surcharges is governed by existing precedents.
With US midterms underway, courts rebuff Trump's pressure on state election officials
Federal judges issued rulings that restricted the Trump administration's efforts aimed at influencing state election officials. These efforts were primarily focused on alleged noncitizen voting, which evidence shows is quite rare. Multiple legal challenges led to precedents affirming state sovereignty regarding election administration. Despite these setbacks, the Justice Department continues to pursue various actions related to noncitizen voting. Recent decisions highlight ongoing tensions between federal and state election authority.
Trump's Supreme Court winning streak in election cases screeches to a halt
The US Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump's bid to stop California from counting more than 20,000 mail-in ballots ahead of Tuesday's midterm elections. The swift ruling marks another setback for the administration in recent election-related cases, following decisions on mail-in voting restrictions and Republican-backed congressional redistricting efforts.
How the citizenship row matters to immigrants after US Supreme Court rejects Trump’s 20,000-ballot plea
The Supreme Court has turned down an urgent request from the Trump administration to halt California's process of counting over 20,000 mail-in ballots. These ballots belong to registered voters whom federal officials believe might not be US citizens. This decision means California can continue with its ballot counting without interference.
SC posts pleas challenging validity of Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 to January 21 next year
The Supreme Court has delayed hearings regarding the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. It has asked the involved parties to finalise their pleadings by December 31, 2026. The court intends to hear challenges that aim to invalidate specific provisions of the Waqf Act. Furthermore, the court had earlier stayed certain clauses to protect party interests while processing the case.
US Supreme Court snubs Trump admin in California ballots case
The US Supreme Court rejected an emergency request by the Trump administration regarding mail-in ballots in California. This request aimed to challenge over 20,000 ballots on the assumption that voters might be non-citizens. Lower courts previously dismissed similar allegations, arguing they indicated election interference. The administration had also faced challenges regarding other states' elections, including Alaska. Voter fraud cases are consistently found to be rare and not affecting election results.
Justice Narasimha recuses from plea to finalise judges’ appointment MoP and bring Collegium decisions under RTI
Supreme Court Justice PS Narasimha recused himself from a case regarding the Memorandum of Procedure for judicial appointments. The plea, filed by NGO Lok Prahari, seeks to finalize the MoP as it has been pending since 2015. This procedure governs the appointment and transfer of judges to higher courts in India. The petition also calls for enhanced transparency in the selection process and access to Collegium meeting minutes.
Family members can reject sale of joint HUF land and treat it as void if Karta sells it solely for personal benefit; Key legal rules you must know
In a Supreme Court ruling from earlier this year, the sale of joint ancestral property was deemed invalid if it only benefited one family member. The court highlighted that the head of a family must demonstrate genuine necessity for such sales. Karta is a manager and not an absolute owner of joint property. Sales favoring one coparcener are particularly susceptible to legal challenges.
RSS terms UGC norms against discrimination 'unbalanced'
RSS has expressed concerns regarding the University Grants Commission's anti-discrimination regulations, stating that they are unbalanced. The government is being urged to revise the framework to maintain social harmony. As the Supreme Court intervened, the UGC regulations were temporarily stayed, allowing the previous framework to continue. The RSS emphasised the need for balanced decisions that would foster societal strength and cohesion.
Omar Abdullah, Nidhi Razdan get married; J&K CM shares ‘new journey’ post
Omar Abdullah and journalist Nidhi Razdan have recently gotten married after Abdullah's past divorce. Their relationship had been publicly acknowledged for some time prior to the marriage announcement. Abdullah's previous marriage to Payal Abdullah was dissolved by the Supreme Court after a mutual consent agreement. Nidhi Razdan is a well-known journalist with experience in both national politics and international affairs.
Woman joins contractual role for short-term, employer doesn't pay three months salary for taking maternity leave, High Court orders temporary employees should receive that benefit too
Chhattisgarh High Court has held that a woman working as a guest lecturer cannot be denied maternity leave salary merely because she is not a regular employee. Justice Bibhu Datta Guru directed the State authorities to decide Pushpa Jaiswal's claim for unpaid maternity salary, preferably within three months.
SC hears Reliance's appeals in $1.73 billion ONGC gas dispute
Reliance Industries is currently appealing a decision made by the Delhi High Court regarding an arbitration award. The High Court had ruled in February 2025, challenging a previous arbitration award from 2018. This legal dispute involves a $1.73 billion case against Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) over gas extraction issues. The government alleges that Reliance and partners committed fraud and unjust enrichment during gas extraction.
US Supreme Court rejects bid to restore immigration judges’ power to pause deportation cases
The US Supreme Court has decided not to grant immigration judges the authority to halt deportation cases temporarily, thereby reinforcing a previous agreement that ended the practice known as administrative closure. This ruling comes after Texas challenged a Biden-era regulation aimed at enhancing judges' managerial capabilities. Despite support from cities like Baltimore and New Haven, attempts to uphold the regulation were dismissed by the courts.
SC must restore previous elected govt in West Bengal: Abhishek Banerjee after court's SIR observations
TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee raised concerns about the electoral legitimacy of the current BJP government in West Bengal. He urged the Supreme Court to restore the previous government and conduct fresh elections within six months. The Supreme Court is evaluating the Election Commission's handling of electoral rolls during the Special Intensive Revision exercise. Banerjee emphasized the need to reinstate all eligible voters excluded from the rolls.
Congress says Election Commission of India's 'affidavit to Supreme Court deceptive'
Congress has accused the Election Commission of India of engaging in deceptive practices related to Form 6. The party spokesperson Jairam Ramesh highlighted inconsistencies in the ECI's affidavit submitted in the Supreme Court. Ramesh criticised the ECI for claiming unanimity in decision-making while revealing widespread media allegations of malpractice. The allegations suggest serious legal violations by the Chief Election Commissioner.
US Supreme Court denies immigration judges the power to shelve deportation cases
The US Supreme Court has denied an emergency request to reinstate a practice for deferring deportation cases. Immigration judges previously used administrative closure to manage deportation dockets efficiently. The ruling stems from a deal made between the Trump administration and Texas, which invalidated this practice. Cities like Baltimore attempted to intervene, arguing that the government improperly colluded to eliminate the regulation.
SC issues notice to EC on plea alleging Form 6 changes during Bihar SIR
The Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Election Commission on Dola Sen's plea concerning voter registration. This plea alleges that changes to Form 6 were made during the Bihar Special Intensive Revision exercise. The Election Commission has defended its actions, stating that the form was not amended as claimed. It asserted that the revisions were approved by its members and followed legal protocols.
Load More
