GOOGLE PROPOSAL REMEDIES
Google should relax ad tech rules, appoint antitrust monitor, US judge finds
U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, gave her assessment in a decision unsealed on Wednesday, two weeks after she rejected the U.S. Department of Justice's insistence that Google break up its business of placing ads across the internet.
Google defeats US bid to force ad tech sale
While the ad exchange is a small part of Google's business, the ruling is the second powerful symbolic victory against the U.S. Department of Justice in its efforts to force Google to sell assets to address illegal monopolies.
CCI relaxes commitment norms, extends filing window to 60 days
The Commission has eased the timeline for preliminary considerations of applications by it to 15 working days from the current seven. Also, the deadline to wrap up the entire commitment proceeding has been raised to 180 working days, with a provision for extension in complex cases, from the current 130 working days. The move comes at a time when the regulator is considering two key commitment applications by IndiGo parent InterGlobe Aviation, and Google. The CCI has sought stakeholder comments on these applications but hasn't yet approved any of them.
Google faces antitrust deja vu as US seeks to break up its digital advertising business
Google is facing a new legal challenge over its dominance in digital advertising, following a previous monopoly ruling on its search business. A trial starting in Virginia will examine claims that Google’s ad tech practices harm competition and publishers, with a ruling on market remedies expected later this year.
Not breaking up Google, CEO Sundar Pichai indicates
Pichai said at the Bloomberg Tech Summit that some of the remedies proposed in the antitrust case against Google are more extreme than the initial scope of the ruling, and the company is in the process of appealing the decision. A ruling is awaited later this year.
Google Search judge zeroes in on AI power in trial resolution
A US court is deciding on remedies for Google's search monopoly. The judge is examining Google's influence in artificial intelligence. The Justice Department wants restrictions on Google's AI practices. They propose measures to boost competition in search and AI. Google opposes these remedies, citing innovation. The court is weighing long-term solutions for the market.
- Go To Page 1
Google a 'monopolist', says Y Combinator in court brief
Y Combinator has accused Google of stifling US startup innovation by monopolising search and online advertising. In a legal filing, it claimed Google’s dominance deters investment in potential rivals. YC proposed curbing exclusive deals and opening Google’s search index, amid ongoing antitrust proceedings over Google’s anti-competitive practices and market control.
US seeks breakup of Google's ad-tech products after judge finds illegal monopoly
Following a court ruling that Google illegally dominated online ad-tech markets, the U.S. Department of Justice has proposed that Google divest its AdX advertising marketplace and DFP ad server. Google opposes the proposal, arguing it exceeds the court's findings and would harm publishers and advertisers. The judge has set a September trial date to address potential remedies.
Google faces September trial on ad tech antitrust remedies
Google will face trial in September over antitrust concerns, with the DOJ pushing for the sale of its ad exchange and publisher ad server business. The DOJ argues this move is necessary to address Google's dominance and anticompetitive practices that harm publishers and internet users.
Google faces trial in US bid to end search monopoly
The trial comes on the heels of a win in a Virginia court on Thursday where a judge ruled in a separate antitrust case that Google maintains an illegal monopoly in advertising technology. The outcome of the trial could fundamentally reshape the internet by unseating Google as the go-to portal for information online.
Google set to battle US government over search monopoly case
Google faces an existential threat as US courts consider remedies for its illegal search monopoly, including banning exclusive deals, forcing data sharing with rivals, and potentially selling Chrome. The outcome, following landmark antitrust rulings, could reshape the tech landscape, though Google plans to appeal any adverse decision
Will Google be forced to sell Chrome? Department of Justice demands divestment
The Department of Justice, under new leadership, has revised its approach to Google's antitrust case but maintains that the tech giant must divest from Chrome. While Google has avoided forced AI sell-offs and Android separation for now, stricter regulations are on the horizon. The case's outcome could reshape Google's dominance in tech.
Alphabet's Google urges US government to avoid breaking up firm, source says
The US Department of Justice is currently pursuing two anti-monopoly cases against Google - one over search and another over advertising technology. The department has laid out potential remedies in the search case, including making Google divest parts of its business such as the Chrome Web browser and ending agreements that make it the default search engine on devices like Apple's iPhone.
Google proposes fix to solve search monopoly
In Google's proposal to fix the search monopoly, it asked Mehta to allow it to continue to pay other companies for its search engine to get prime placement. But it said those agreements should be less restrictive than in the past. Apple, for example, could select different search engines to come up automatically for iPhone and iPad users, said Lee-Anne Mulholland, the company's vice president of regulatory affairs, in a blog post.
Google offers to loosen search deals in US antitrust case remedy
Google urged U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington to move cautiously in deciding what the company must do to restore competition, after his ruling that the company holds an illegal monopoly in online search and related advertising. Courts have cautioned against imposing antitrust remedies that chill innovation, Google said in court papers.
What's next for Google's search monopoly
The US government has proposed breaking up Google to address its internet search monopoly, including forcing the sale of Chrome. This follows a ruling that Google violated antitrust laws by entrenching its dominance through contracts and data advantages. Remedies, due this month, could reshape the tech landscape, with decisions expected by August 2024.
DoJ pushes to dismantle Google's search monopoly; what it means for the tech giant
The case, which was initially filed during President-elect Donald Trump's first term, aims to stop Google from using its dominant search engine to unlawfully suppress competition and hinder innovation. Going forward, Google can present its own proposed fixes in December, while federal regulators plan to submit a revised edition of their proposals by early March. Court hearings on the proposed measures will begin in April.
Google must sell Chrome to restore competition in online search, DOJ argues
The US Department of Justice proposed Google to sell its Chrome browser, share data and search results with rivals, and potentially sell Android to end its online search monopoly. These measures, deemed necessary to restore competition, are scheduled for trial in April. Google criticised the proposals as government overreach that could harm consumers and innovation.
What you need to know about the proposed measures designed to curb Google's search monopoly
The US Justice Department has proposed aggressive measures to curb Google's market dominance in online search, including a potential breakup of the tech giant. These recommendations, if adopted, could force Google to spin off its Chrome browser, license its search data to competitors, and cease prioritizing its own services in search results.
Legal hurdles ahead for Google's forced sale of Chrome
The US Department of Justice is pushing for Alphabet, Google's parent company, to sell its Chrome browser and implement other measures to curb its search dominance. The DOJ argues that Google holds an illegal monopoly in the search market. These proposals, part of a significant antitrust case, face potential legal battles and uncertainty under the incoming Trump administration.
Will Google be forced to sell Chrome? Here’s what US Department of Justice has proposed
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has intensified its antitrust efforts with a bold proposal to implement sweeping measures aimed at breaking Google’s dominance in the search market.
Google's antitrust case in the US: a timeline
Google, the internet giant, has an antitrust violation filed by the Justice Department of the United States that has been spanning for almost 4 years now, starting from October 20, 2020. Here is a timeline of the progress of the case throughout the years.
'First of all, we plan to…': Google CEO Sundar Pichai on the proposal of breaking up the company
During an earnings call, Pichai expressed confidence in the company's legal stance and its commitment to product accessibility amid antitrust concerns. He emphasized that Google will vigorously contest a recent ruling and highlighted potential unintended consequences of the Department of Justice's proposals on the tech sector. Pichai reiterated that Google’s success stems from innovation and strong consumer choice, noting that it remains the best search engine.
Google to be broken into pieces? Here is what US plans to do to end tech giant's monopoly
Google is under pressure as the U.S. Department of Justice considers breaking up the tech giant, following a court ruling that deemed it an illegal monopolist. The DOJ is exploring options that include the divestiture of Google’s Android operating system or Chrome browser. The company also faces challenges from Europe, where it recently lost a legal battle concerning its Google Shopping service. These global antitrust cases reflect efforts to curb the dominance of Big Tech across industries.
US plan to break up Google's search dominance threatens profit engine, AI growth
The U.S. Department of Justice's proposed remedies to break up Google's search dominance could significantly weaken its business and hinder its AI advancements. The DOJ is considering various options, including forcing Google to divest parts of its business, limiting its data collection, and restricting its AI development.
What comes next in Google's antitrust case over search?
The U.S. Department of Justice is expected on Tuesday to tell a judge what actions Alphabet's Google should take after he ruled in August that it illegally monopolized online search in the United States, the latest step in a long legal process.
US said to consider a breakup of Google to address search monopoly
The Justice Department is weighing actions to address Google's antitrust violations after the company was found to have maintained an internet search monopoly. Potential remedies include breaking off parts of Google, like Chrome and Android, or sharing its data with rivals. A process for determining the fix is due by September 4.
The Google antitrust case must not end with a slap on the wrist
A federal judge has ruled Google has a monopoly on online search and has been illegally defending that monopoly for years. But what should the remedy be?
Google's loss to Epic Games may cost billions but final outcome years away
Epic Games will now have a chance to submit a court filing on how it wants Google's Play Store to be fixed - potentially putting at risk what Wells Fargo estimates is $10 billion in annual revenue from app sales and in-app purchases for the tech giant.
Load More
