Search
+
    SEARCHED FOR:

    CJI CHANDRACHUD

    Former CJI Chandrachud’s message to youth amid protest calls over SIR & EC | CJP
    'Institutions Matter': Ex-CJI Chandrachud’s message to youth amid protest calls over SIR & EC | CJP
    Experts divided over Justice Kaul's criticism of ex-CJI Chandrachud's approach to judicial appointments

    Sanjay Kishan Kaul has raised concerns regarding the judicial appointment approach of former Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud. Legal experts have expressed differing opinions on Kaul's criticisms, with some defending Chandrachud's tenure and others supporting Kaul. Senior advocates have highlighted issues related to judicial independence and the allocation of sensitive cases during Chandrachud's administration. While some praise his leadership, others suggest he was deferential to the government.

    Ex-SC judge SK Kaul criticises ex-CJI Chandrachud, says he was ‘too deferential to govt’ on judicial appointments

    Sanjay Kishan Kaul expresses concerns about the approach taken by ex-CJI D Y Chandrachud regarding judicial appointments. He highlights a specific meeting where a sixth candidate was proposed without proper collegium discussion. Kaul suggests that Chandrachud's practices could compromise judicial independence and future appointments. Further, he raises issues about previous discussions with the government influencing these decisions.

    Congress cites ex-SC judge's memoir to flag 'serious questions' on independence of judiciary under Modi govt

    The Congress has questioned judicial independence under the Modi government, citing a yet-to-be-released memoir by former Supreme Court judge Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul. Jairam Ramesh flagged reported concerns over government involvement in judicial appointments and the reassignment of a bench hearing a money laundering law case.

    Supreme Court judges call off JPC interaction over possible review of ONOE Bills

    In a recent turn of events, Supreme Court judges have opted against holding an informal dialogue with the Joint Parliamentary Committee regarding the proposed amendments. Their apprehensions revolve around the potential for future judicial review of those amendments. Kapil Sibal condemned the meeting as unconstitutional, arguing it infringed upon the separation of powers.

    The Economic Times
    BACK TO TOP