Search
+
    SEARCHED FOR:

    MENSTRUATING AGE

    Sabarimala women entry issue resurfaces following ex-TDB chief's allegations

    Alleged disclosures by former Travancore Devaswom Board president A Padmakumar have reignited the Sabarimala women's entry controversy. Reports suggest Padmakumar claimed he and a senior police officer were deliberately kept away from the temple premises on the day two women entered. He reportedly alleged a highly influential person orchestrated this. The CPI(M) has stated Padmakumar should clarify these claims himself.

    Cannot be three days of untouchability for women, says Justice B V Nagarathna during Sabarimala case hearing

    A Supreme Court judge has voiced strong disapproval of the practice of barring menstruating women from the Sabarimala temple. Justice B V Nagarathna stated that women should not face three days of untouchability each month. The court is hearing arguments on faith versus fundamental rights.

    Centre tells Supreme Court Sabarimala verdict was wrongly decided

    The Centre told the Supreme Court that Indian society treats women equally and places them on a higher pedestal. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued before a nine-member bench. The court is examining religious practices affecting women. The hearing includes pleas on discrimination at religious places like Sabarimala. The ruling will impact women's entry into Sabarimala temple.

    Whose rituals, whose rights? Sabarimala U-turn exposes the tension between tradition, politics, and equality

    Kerala's ruling LDF has reversed its stance on the Sabarimala Temple issue. The party now supports religious fundamentalism and traditional rituals over gender equality. This shift follows an earlier endorsement of a Supreme Court verdict allowing women's entry. The LDF's new position prioritizes the protection of rituals. This decision may alienate various voter groups.

    Constitution over tradition: Why ‘essential practices’ must not override individual rights

    India's Supreme Court is embarking on an examination of religious traditions to determine their compliance with fundamental rights. Key cases under consideration involve access to temples and various customary practices. The court aims to highlight constitutional protections against discrimination, advocating for secular statutes to take precedence over religious exemptions.

    Woman can't be treated as 'untouchable' for 3 days: Justice Nagarathna in Sabarimala case

    Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna stated women cannot be considered untouchable for three days monthly. This remark came during hearings on discrimination at religious sites, including Sabarimala. The court is examining petitions on women's rights and religious freedom. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta objected to the 2018 Sabarimala judgment's view on untouchability. The hearing continues on these crucial matters.

    The Economic Times
    BACK TO TOP