Listen to this article in summarized format

Courts lift the corporate veil - that is, disregard a company's separate legal identity - when the corporate structure is used to commit fraud or illegal actions, or to evade taxes and legal obligations. They do this in exceptional circumstances when there is specific evidence of wrongdoing. Once the veil is lifted, there's a possibility that personal liability of a company's directors can be invoked, depending on the crime's magnitude. In this case, the question of invoking personal liability was settled by a Supreme Court verdict on a similar matter involving Ansal.
Housing development companies use the corporate parent and project-level subsidiary structure extensively because of the business agility it provides. Yet, the structure needs to be used within overall safeguards around corporate layering. Inadequate governance could invite greater legal scrutiny in sensitive markets like housing. New regulations for the real estate industry have curbed malpractice. Yet, homebuyers still need legal recourse on occasion. These cases could involve more transparency over corporate layering. The market has been made more legally secure from the consumer's side. But a solution must extend to altering the market structure that allows easy violations.
(Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.
(Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.


