The Economic Times daily newspaper is available online now.

    You need more than lifting the corp veil

    Synopsis

    The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has made a bold move by dissolving the corporate barrier between Ansal Properties and its affiliated company, Ansal Hi-Tech Township. This decisive action comes in response to their non-compliance with previous directives to refund disgruntled homebuyers.

    Listen to this article in summarized format

    You Need More Than Lifting the Corp Veil
    Need to alter housing market structure
    National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has lifted the veil between housing developer Ansal Properties & Infrastructure (API) and its project-level subsidiary Ansal Hi-Tech Township for failing to comply with earlier rulings directing refund of homebuyers' money. API chairman Pranav Ansal was, however, not made personally liable, although the tribunal held that he controlled both companies that were inextricably linked. NCDRC took note of a Supreme Court ruling in another case involving Ansal that he could not be held personally liable because he was not party to the original consumer complaint. But he was found to have wilfully not complied with the tribunal's orders over refunds and interest. It also said it would go deeper into the question of corporate layering.

    Courts lift the corporate veil - that is, disregard a company's separate legal identity - when the corporate structure is used to commit fraud or illegal actions, or to evade taxes and legal obligations. They do this in exceptional circumstances when there is specific evidence of wrongdoing. Once the veil is lifted, there's a possibility that personal liability of a company's directors can be invoked, depending on the crime's magnitude. In this case, the question of invoking personal liability was settled by a Supreme Court verdict on a similar matter involving Ansal.

    Housing development companies use the corporate parent and project-level subsidiary structure extensively because of the business agility it provides. Yet, the structure needs to be used within overall safeguards around corporate layering. Inadequate governance could invite greater legal scrutiny in sensitive markets like housing. New regulations for the real estate industry have curbed malpractice. Yet, homebuyers still need legal recourse on occasion. These cases could involve more transparency over corporate layering. The market has been made more legally secure from the consumer's side. But a solution must extend to altering the market structure that allows easy violations.

    Add ET Logo as a Reliable and Trusted News Source

    (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)

    Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.

    ...more
    The Economic Times

    Stories you might be interested in