The Economic Times daily newspaper is available online now.

    SC stays trial court proceedings in defamation case against Rahul Gandhi over Modi remarks

    Synopsis

    The Supreme Court has halted defamation proceedings against Congress MP Rahul Gandhi related to comments about PM Narendra Modi. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Aparesh Kumar Singh issued notices to the complainant M H Shrishrimal and the Maharashtra government. They must submit replies within four weeks while proceedings before the trial court remain stayed. Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi argued legal precedents support Gandhi's case during the hearing.

    Listen to this article in summarized format

    Rahul Gandhi- Supreme CourtAgencies

    The Supreme Court has stayed trial court proceedings in a defamation case against Congress MP Rahul Gandhi over his 2019 remarks targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi, while seeking responses from the complainant and the Maharashtra government.

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday halted further proceedings in a trial court in Maharashtra regarding a defamation case against Congress MP Rahul Gandhi over his 2019 remarks targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

    A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Aparesh Kumar Singh issued notices to both the complainant, M H Shrishrimal, and the Maharashtra government, directing them to submit their replies within four weeks.

    "Issue notice returnable in four weeks. Further proceedings before the trial court shall remain stayed," the bench ordered while hearing Gandhi's challenge to a September 8 Bombay High Court judgment that had declined to set aside the summons issued to him.


    Also read: Rahul Gandhi to host high tea for INDIA bloc MPs, civil society members, student organisations on Tuesday

    Representing the Raebareli MP, Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi cited previous Supreme Court rulings, emphasizing that the legal position on this issue is well established.

    The apex court scheduled the next hearing after four weeks.

    Earlier, on September 8, the Bombay High Court had rejected Gandhi's petition seeking to quash the 2019 summons. That petition had challenged an August 28, 2019 order by a Girgaum magistrate initiating process against him based on Shrishrimal's complaint. However, the High Court extended its 2021 interim relief by directing the magistrate court to defer proceedings for six weeks, enabling Gandhi to move the Supreme Court.

    In his submission before the High Court, Shrishrimal argued that as a BJP member, he felt personally aggrieved by the derogatory comments directed at his party leader. The original complaint cited a public address delivered by Gandhi in Rajasthan on September 20, 2018, alleging that his statements cast direct allegations on all BJP members and citizens associated with PM Modi.

    Add ET Logo as a Reliable and Trusted News Source

    (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
    The Economic Times

    Stories you might be interested in